On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Adam Jack wrote: > > Adam, I think we should get rid of FoG entirely until we have a better > > solution. It is causing more harm than good.
IMHO, you just need to ensure that people understand what FoG means. The acronym by itself is pure confusion, so I'd suggest either picking another one or avoiding an acronym all together. -- Martin Cooper > > What is harm and what is refining discussion? If we remove it, what > incentive do folks have to contribute improvements? > > I'll do whatever the group determines, but first teach me OSS 101 on such > matters, please. Is this too bad to tolerate, or just bad enough to entice? > > Input? > > regards > > Adam > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
