On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:46PM, Nigel Daley wrote:
> Just to follow up, the pre-commit patch testing is functioning again on
> Zookeeper and Hadoop Common.  It's also ready to run on MapReduce and HDFS
> but we won't turn it on until these projects build and test cleanly.  Looks
> like both these projects currently have test failures.  Are there Jira's to
> fix these tests?

In HDFS some of the tests are covered by JIRAs for sure. I haven't checked MR
lately but it should be the same there.

> New instructions for re-trigger testing of a patch are at 
> https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-Admin/
> 
> Cheers,
> Nige
> 
> On Oct 20, 2010, at 1:30 PM, Nigel Daley wrote:
> 
> > Thanks Giri.
> > 
> >> Longterm solution: 
> >> email patch process and queue creation is un-reliable. As a long term 
> >> solution we need to use jira-cli command line tool to read patch directly 
> >> from jira. 
> > 
> > Ya, that's what I've got mostly working on my machine.  Any open Jira's for 
> > this work?  If not, I'll open one.
> > 
> >> And doing this would require introducing a new workflow in jira. Apart 
> >> from the current status called "patch-available"
> > 
> > Not sure that's necessary.  I think if we change the patch testing model a 
> > little, we can keep the current workflow.  Also, given some recent advances 
> > in Hudson, I think we can reduce all the patch jobs down to 1 admin job 
> > covering *all* projects and 1 job per project -- and we should be able to 
> > drastically improve utilization of the slaves we have.  Let's move this 
> > discussion to a ticket.  LMK if I need to open one.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Nige
> > 
> > On Oct 20, 2010, at 1:17 PM, Giridharan Kesavan wrote:
> > 
> >> 
> >> Old times:
> >> The hudson patch-testing admin job used to run on the master machine 
> >> hudson.zones.apache.org as this machine used to parse the emails from jira 
> >> and create the patch queue for testing.
> >> 
> >> Current situation: 
> >> hudson.zones.apache.org machine is no more a master and we have a new 
> >> machine called aegis.apache.org as the master machine. 
> >> 
> >> This machine is configured to process the email and create the patch 
> >> queue.  <done>
> >> Though we are able to get the email and create the patch queue on the new 
> >> aegis.apache.org machine, still we wont be able to trigger patch admin job 
> >> on the hudson master as this is not allowed in the new setup.  
> >> 
> >> Infra team doesn't want us to run any builds on the hudson master. Instead 
> >> they want all the builds to run on the slave machine.  
> >> 
> >> I got the password-less access for hudson user from hudson slave 
> >> h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net to aegis.apache.org like 2 weeks back. <done>   
> >> 
> >> The plan here is to read the patch queue on aegis from h1 and schedule 
> >> builds.   <I'm working on getting this to work>
> >> 
> >> Longterm solution: 
> >> email patch process and queue creation is un-reliable. As a long term 
> >> solution we need to use jira-cli command line tool to read patch directly 
> >> from jira. 
> >> And doing this would require introducing a new workflow in jira. Apart 
> >> from the current status called "patch-available"
> >> 
> >> Thanks,
> >> Giri
> >> 
> >> On Oct 20, 2010, at 12:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> >> 
> >>> Thanks for getting to it, Nigel. This is absolutely useful and allows to 
> >>> keep
> >>> weeds out of the trunk up to a certain degree.
> >>> 
> >>> There were at least two slightly different sources of information about 
> >>> what's
> >>> going on with test-patch process. Would you mind to post a brief about the
> >>> situation so comments can be more substantial?
> >>> 
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Cos
> >>> 
> >>> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:47PM, Nigel Daley wrote:
> >>>> Folks, 
> >>>> 
> >>>> I'm working to get the pre-commit patch testing running again for HDFS,
> >>>> HADOOP, and MAPREDUCE patches.  Since I've been on a bit of a hiatus from
> >>>> day-to-day involvement w/ the project over the last 6 months (new job), I
> >>>> want to check in and make sure folks would still find this pre-commit
> >>>> testing useful.  Also, happy to hear any suggested improvement.  Let me
> >>>> know.  
> >>>> 
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Nige
> >> 
> > 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to