so if 0.20 becomes 1.0, what does 0.22 become ? I'm still not sure if we shouldn't just add security to 0.22, and leave the 0.20 in maintenance mode from here on.
On Jan 12, 2011, at 4:10 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > On Jan 11, 2011, at 9:09 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > >> I'm open to suggestions - how about something like 20.100 to show that it's >> a big jump? Anything else? > > > Although I'm not wild about any of the potential release names, this patch > set is neither a subset or superset of the 0.21 or 0.22 branches. Given that, > I think that a new major release number makes the most sense. It is also > relatively likely that additional minor releases will be made off of this > branch while 0.22 is stabilizing. We've talked about declaring 0.20 a 1.0 for > a long time and this feels like backing into the decision, but technically, I > believe it to be the right name for such a release. > > Thoughts? > > -- Owen
