Hi Arun! On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Arun C Murthy <a...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > I'm all for people working on what they are passionate about, so this isn't > to say one shouldn't spend time on 0.22. > > But, for clarity's sake, as I've done multiple times on both the list and in > person to Konstantin etc., > I'll point out (again) that 0.22 will need multiple man-years of development > to achieve parity with > 0.20.2xx just in terms of bug-fixes and performance.
I apologize if my level of institutional knowledge of these things is lacking, but do you have any benchmarking results between 0.22 and 0.20.2xx? The reason I'm asking is twofold -- I really would like to see an objective numbers qualifying the viability of 0.22 from the performance stand point, but more importantly I would really like to include the benchmarking code into Bigtop. In terms of bugs -- same question. Is there any publicly available list of, at least, the critical ones that make 0.22 not viable from your point of view? Thanks, Roman.
