Thanks Andy, I think this is a clear summary of what would be a good outcome.
I would suggest that detailed bigtop discussions should go to bigtop, but status updates are undoubtedly interesting to this audience. But I do request that folks not "inject exhortations to participate in Bigtop into random other topics on general@, such as status reports by another project or group". E14 On Sep 30, 2011, at 9:34 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > This time it seems easy to split the difference here. > > - Sufficient interest in Bigtop so announcements and discussions can/should > go to general@.* > > - There is no need to (and a request not to) inject exhortations to > participate in Bigtop into random other topics on general@, such as status > reports by another project or group. Simply create new threads to discuss > Bigtop matters. > > * - Seems to me a community effort to qualify an integrated stack top to > bottom is a good thing, but I question doing this for 0.22, which nobody is > going to use much, or so I hear. > > Best regards, > > > - Andy > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via > Tom White) > > >> ________________________________ >> From: Konstantin Shvachko <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 2:23 AM >> Subject: Re: Update on hadoop-0.23 >> >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi Doug, Jeff, Roman >>> >>> I'd like to request that folks take bigtop project discussions onto >>> the bigtop lists and don't greet status reports on general@hadoop >> >> I am personally very interested in the results of testing of 0.22 with >> BigTop, or other tools, or without any tools. >> So I'd like to ask (rather than request) good people to continue >> posting your findings on the general@hadoop list. >> >> Eric, thank you for your continuous contributions to Apache Hadoop. >> >> I also think that general@hadoop is the right place to discuss >> inter-project issues like making HBase, Pig, Hive, >> working on Hadoop 0.22 and 0.23. Where else? >> >> Thanks, >> --Konstantin >> >>
