I believe it has been advocated a number of times in that thread to release 0.22 as 2.0.
Are you suggesting to drop 0.22 out of the picture all together? Any reason for that? Thanks, Cos On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 05:37PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > On 11/15/2011 01:43 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > +1 to Steve's proposal. Renaming 0.20 is too big a pain at this point. > > Everyone seems to agree that we should rename 0.23 to either 2.0 or 3.0. > There are a number of different views about what to do with 0.20, 0.21 > and 0.22. So maybe we should proceed where there's consensus and not > argue extensively where there's disagreement? > > Since 0.23 has little install base yet it should be easy to rename. If > we're not going to rename 0.20, 0.21 or 0.22 releases then 3.0 seems > inappropriate. > > Can we agree to 0.23 -> 2.0? That's consistent with the MR2 nomenclature. > > Doug
