On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Arun Murthy <a...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > Eli, > > Seems to me that trying to 'carry over' numbers from 0.20.2xx would, > at best, lead to confusion... similar to folks asking for non-existent > 0.20.201/202. > > I propose we look forward with hadoop-1.0.0 as the supported release > with security+append to keep things simple. > > Thoughts? >
Are you proposing 205.1 be called 1.0.1 and 206 will be 1.1.0? Or that we rename 0.205.0 to be 1.0.0 and 205.1 will be 1.0.1 and 206.0 will be 1.1.0? That seems just as confusing IMO but I don't feel strongly either way. Thanks, Eli
