3, 1, 5, 4, 2 no binding. I don't like a "hole" there as it means a lack of foresight sometimes.
Thanks, Junping ----- Original Message ----- From: "Arun C Murthy" <a...@hortonworks.com> To: general@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 9:06:41 AM Subject: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x We've discussed several options: (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). The vote will run the normal 7 days. thanks, Arun [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
