On Sunday, Sep 21, 2003, at 06:15 Europe/Rome, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 22:25:53 -0400 Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
"Meritocracy"?yes, meritocracy. the entire asf is a meritocracy, as is each project within it.
I see. but here's one question. Does this "meritocracy" encourage the inactive *ASF members* into the retirement status or hibernation status?
it would, if the ASF members had consensus on what "inactive" means, or how to encourage without offending.
> Also, I assume that all the ASF members have signed the "new" CLA
as a matter of course ... is this true?
??? what is the 'new' CLA?
Here is a gooooood stats on this ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) mailing list.:Hope this helps :-)not really, at least not for me, since i don't know what point you're trying to make..
Eheh,
I should have put that on the threads of "[VOTE] dims for incubator PMC" or "[VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)" ... :-)
Also, I will make use of this stats in "Please make me a committer of Incubator Project: incubator-site" campaign :-)
I admit I'm lost as much as Ken on this. What the hell are you talking about? can't you be more explicit, please?
-- Stefano.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
