On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jan 5, 2006, at 1:38 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 1/4/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So .. amidst all of our soul searching .. what'd we decide to do with
the Ajax proposal from IBM et al.?? Did I miss the vote and decision??
I don't believe there is a sponsoring PMC at this point.
Once we have had a chance to digest all the input and finish dotting the
I's and crossing the T's from a legal perspective, Adam or I will come back
to ask for a vote.
Personally, I would prefer that the ASF not accept _any_ AJAX framework at
this point in time. The area is relatively new and in a great deal of flux
right now, and "crowning" one of them with the ASF brand will create a de
facto standard instead of letting the market decide, whether we like it or
not.
I realise that the Incubator doesn't work that way, though, and that
plenty
of people don't seem to care / mind that we'd create a (premature, IMHO)
de
facto standard, but I can always hope. ;-)
Sanjiva and I have experience with Apache SOAP. Two rewrites later, and
there is a thriving community working on Apache Axis2.
The goal here is not to "crown" anything, but to provide the grain of sand
that will lead to the production of a pearl.
I am a big +1 on the ASF getting "involved" with AJAX.
Oh, I am too. I'd just prefer to start off on the right foot.
--
Martin Cooper
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
