How timely...i've just spent the last hour or two today looking at AsyncWeb after Dan Diephouse telling me about it at ApacheCon in Dublin. I'm interested how this could be used by Tuscany or Synapse, so moving it to Apache sounds good to me.
...ant On 7/3/06, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/4/06, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jul 3, 2006, at 11:17 AM, Irving, Dave wrote: > >> So, my proposal is, how about we start creating module(s) in > >> MINA for protocols? > >> > > > > Of course, Im biased - but It would be a shame if we re-wrote http > > support on top of Mina over again, when we have asyncweb already :o) > > We were originally going to make asyncweb a subproject of mina, but at > > the time it was decided it would be cleaner to keep it as a separate > > project. > > Right, it certainly would be a shame. > > Interested in bringing AsyncWeb over here? :) Bringing in AsyncWeb and other possible future contributions will make this project quite too big to fit into a subproject. We might need an incubation process to find a better place for MINA eventually. Any idea? I will CC this message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think that if it lived w/MINA, it might get more help staying up-to- > date with our API changes. I agree with you. :) Cheers, Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP key fingerprints: * E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41 4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E * B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4 455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6
