On 11/6/06, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I understand it is good practice to restart a vote if the vote thread
becomes heavy with discussion. This is the case with the vote that was
begun at
http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg11201.html
which contains some issues raised and comments to address each of those
issues.
So please vote to ratify the Tuscany PPMC vote to release SDO for Java M2
artifacts at http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5a/ which
have been voted for by the Tuscany PPMC.
+1
Though I agree with the earlier sentiment expressed by Bill Dudney [1]
that the LICENSE and/or NOTICE file should explicitly state which jars
are under which licenses. This is at least not the case for the RC5a
binary. Otherwise, good job!
--
jaaron
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg11273.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
