On 3/15/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The version attribute is more appropriate IMO, and what was agreed upon in an earlier thread on this list. [1]
+1, it eases the migration when the project graduates. - Xavier Regards,
Martijn [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200611.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 3/15/07, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On 3/14/07, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My personal opinion is that an "incubator" in the groupId or > > artifactId would be more than sufficient to mark the Incubator status > > +1 > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
