What might work is for the [DISCUSS] and [VOTE] of the candidate to be held simultaneously on the PPMC private mailing list and the IPMC private mailing list. All of both the IPMC and PPMC can fully participate in the process. Then, at the end of the [VOTE] it will be clear whether the vote passed.
Craig On Jun 20, 2007, at 8:50 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Upayavira wrote:The implication here is that, if we consider the IPMC to have the roleof overseeing podlingsIs there an "if" there? ;-) That *is* the job of the Incubator PMC, and it is the sole holder of that role.IPMC members must have the necessary rights to do so.The Incubator PMC is the managing entity of all things in the Incubator. Nothing is private from the Incubator PMC, by definition.perhaps IPMC members should have access to all podling private lists.No perhaps about it. Any Incubator PMC member who wants to be on any @i.a.o list can be; if they have any difficulty being moderated on, they should contact me (or anyone else with apmail karma).the right to see archives, but I don't know whether they'd need a member proxy to see the archives or if that can be done via unix perms on p.a.o).At present all private list archives are available only to ASF Members. This is not policy so much as a pragmatic limitation of available ACLs. apmail is the owner and apmember is the group. We have talked about having a protected web interface to private lists, but thus no one has stepped to do it. And there are issues to resolve related to granularity of access.--- Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
