On Nov 16, 2007 2:10 PM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 16, 2007, at 2:09 AM, Raymond Feng wrote: > > > Hi, Kevan. > > > > Thank you for the review. We have fixed the issue and republished a > > RC5a at: > > > > SVN Tag: > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.0.1-RC5a/ > > > > Stage maven repo: > http://people.apache.org/~rfeng/tuscany/maven/1.0.1-RC5a<http://people.apache.org/%7Erfeng/tuscany/maven/1.0.1-RC5a> > > > > RAT report: > > http://people.apache.org/~rfeng/tuscany/1.0.1-RC5a/1.0.1-RC5a.rat.txt<http://people.apache.org/%7Erfeng/tuscany/1.0.1-RC5a/1.0.1-RC5a.rat.txt> > > > > Binary and source distros (zip/gz/asc/md5) : > > http://people.apache.org/~rfeng/tuscany/1.0.1-RC5a/<http://people.apache.org/%7Erfeng/tuscany/1.0.1-RC5a/> > > > > Since the fix doesn't involve any 'code' changes, can we skip the > > tuscany-dev vote and continue the IPMC vote here? Please advise. > > Well, I've certainly seen incubator votes continue with similar > issues, in the past. I'm fine with the vote continuing, as long as the > problem (and changes) have been communicated to the tuscany community. > > The updated binaries look good. > > Here's my +1. > > One minor note for future releases: some of your jar files contain > both a LICENSE and a LICENSE.txt file. > > --kevan > > I've already voted over on tuscany-dev but I'll also vote +1 here to keep the thread current...still looking for one more vote if anyone else has any time to take a look at the release.
...ant
