J Aaron Farr wrote:

> The legal committee has previously been tasked with a "fork" FAQ
> that would cover this and the PRC team is currently working on a
> "trademarks" FAQ that should also cover this.

And this is neither of those groups, nor have those other tasks been completed.

FWIW, your claim is the exact opposite of what has previously been stated, 
which is why I agree that we need an FAQ.

        --- Noel



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to