On Feb 3, 2008 7:47 PM, Filip at Apache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > On Feb 3, 2008 7:36 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> ...Craig has a good point - maybe that 'pruning' process, to the > >> extent it's appropriate, should happen before they start the actual > >> graduation process? > >> > >> The question is how, and it's something no established project has > >> ever figured out, nevermind our podlings :)... > >> > > > > Hence the suggestion that some of us discussed in December: > > re-electing podling committers is a no-brainer for active people, and > > gives others a chance to step out. > > > Make it part of the graduation for the contributors in the podling to > decide if they want to continue or not. the folks who have made the > podling successful enough to graduate should not have to be re-elected. > In the other ASF projects, if a committer has not been active, (s)he > gets a chance to decide if (s)he wants to step out, one does not start a > process of re-electing active one. That seems so backwards.
STM that something along these lines would be a more lightweight but equally effective process. we could ask the PPMC if it's pruned inactive committers from the graudation list. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
