On Friday 07 March 2008 16:39, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > So the CCLA exists for those who's employment agreements would otherwise > cause them to violate their claims made via their CLA contract.
Uhhh.... So, are we now saying that heaps of people don't need to get the CCLA from their employer? I thought the CCLA was the "belt and suspenders" to ensure that the employee has the right that he claims. Otherwise, why is the CCLA a matter between the employer and ASF, and not a standard document to be signed between the employer and employee, for the employee to keep. Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
