On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 4:57 AM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > >>> The current tally is extremely close (9 +1 vs. 8 -1 binding) > >>> I don't want to close an issue with such a small margin. > >> I suggest that we should not change policy on anything like this lack of > >> concensus. I do, however, suggest that pressure be put on Maven to > >> enforce signing. > > As no-maven still hasn't been justified, and when we authorized releases > > we had not explicitly called out specific channels, so I'm wondering what > > the "change" you refer to actually is :) > > Right now, the policy has been an Incubator-specific repository, not the > main one. > > And the general statement is that when we have an issue with no clear > consensus, we should take care about making changes on slim margins. > > > I'd not been able to decide how to vote on this but it doesn't feel right to have it decided by a 9 to 8 vote. There clearly isn't consensus and there's still lots of discussion going on about it in this and other threads so for now my vote is -1. ...ant
