On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 13:54 +0100, sebb wrote: > On 22/09/2008, Thomas Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I'd reckon that we all now agree that the tomcat jars can be included. > > > > > > > > > > Assuming that they have not included the jars incorrectly. > > > > > > > I will check that the jars in question are those released by tomcat. > > > > > > > Perhaps it would be better to double-check with legal? > > > > > > > If the jars are ASL licensed, I do not see the need. Correct me if I'm > > wrong. > > > > What I meant was - just because the jars are part of another Apache > product does not necessarily mean that they are ASL licensed. One > would hope that they are, but given some of the other postings in this > thread I though it would be prudent to double-check this.
While I appreciate your concern and you are right, that you can not simply take a jar from another Apache project and assume it is AL licensed (you do can assume that you can bundle it with your project and, as long as you have appropriate NOTICE and LICENSE.txt entries, you can ship the result under AL. That is what our license is all about BTW... :-) ), in this case, the servlet-api jar is built from http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/servletapi/tags/servlet2.4-jsp2.0-tc5.x/TOMCAT_5_5_27/jsr154 and the JSP API jar is built from http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/servletapi/tags/servlet2.4-jsp2.0-tc5.x/TOMCAT_5_5_27/jsr152 Please, can we lay this to rest? Thanks. :-) Ciao Henning --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
