2008/10/13 Gurkan Erdogdu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Matthias, > > I do not know the mail adress of the Crazy Bob. I dropped information into to > the google-guice developer list about the OpenWebBeans proposal but I have > got no response so far. I also dropped the message into the JBoss Seam > framework mailing list. Pete Muir from the JBoss replied with kindly message > that he said "You could welcome to help into the WebBeans RI effort in the > JBoss". But I said him, I think that different RI from the different > foundations is great.
I am subscribed on this list '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' and I haven't seen a post from you there. Also I don't see that there was any other "WebBeans announcement". Maybe it is worth to ask them, if they wanna join (or not). doing it here is fine, IMO. That's why I offered help in being a mentor / champion. > > I wonder the voting is stopped in this time or how will the process continue? Hrm, we always can revote. IMO no need to rush; Things should be cleared before continuing the *process* _M > > Thanks; > > Gurkan > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 6:26:41 PM > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal] > > Gurkan- > > have you tried to ping the Guice folks ? > > I wonder if they > a) would be interested in joining this effort, here at Apache (Crazy > Bob is an apache committer) > b) prefer to work on the RI, at JBoss (Crazy Bob is EG member) > c) have no steaks into the WebBeans effort > > -Matthias > > 2008/10/13 Gurkan Erdogdu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Hi, >> >> First of all, there are lots of places that I could propose my project, but >> I think that open source development with the Apache Way conveys the real >> Free and Professional Open Source Project with meritrocracy in action. >> >> This code could be part of the Geronimo project as its Web Beans container, >> or could be the top level project its own. I only know that there is only >> one effort to create RI, this is the JBoss RI (Pete Muir is responsible for >> implementing, Gavin King for creating the spec) at the web side >> http://seamframework.org/WebBeans. And its implementation is in the early >> stage. >> >> Indeed, Apache way implementation makes different from the others, because >> and most importantly its developed based on the Apache Way and it also >> creates additions to the RI with creating add-on components that are based >> on the other Apache projects, such as, OpenEJB, OpenJPA, JSecurity, ActiveMQ >> etc, possible. Morevoer, It's always good to have multiple implementations >> of a spec so enterprise community benefits from the different >> imlpementations, and they choose the best (Like MyFaces and Sun JSF >> imeplemtnations.) >> >> I am ready for doing lots of work to this project progresses. Moreover, I >> get some great response from the below individuals to help this project >> succesfull, >> >> - Kevan Miller : As a mentor and partly committer >> - Conny Lundgren : JSR-299 EG member as a committer. >> >> And also, I think the committer number is increased by the time. >> >> As I said in the beginning, I believe that open source must be transparent, >> and the community appreciates the heavy working to implement this spec >> within the Apache Foundation. >> >> Sincerely; >> >> Gurkan Erdogdu >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ---- >> From: J Aaron Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: general@incubator.apache.org >> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 8:13:05 AM >> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal] >> >> Gurkan Erdogdu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Hi to all; >>> >>> I have posted a proposal about the project, named OpenWebBeans. >>> >>> It is in the WIKI, its address is >>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWebBeansProposal >> >> I have a number of questions before I can support the proposal: >> >> Where do you expect this code / community to end up after the >> incubator? Will it be part of Geronimo? Part of MySpaces? It's own >> TLP? I can say now that if the project is to stand on its own, then >> there's a lot of work to do. >> >> It seems as though there are 2 or 3 other Apache licensed efforts in >> creating a RI for JSR-299: Gavin King's work, JBoss's work and the >> rumored Guice work. What makes this RI effort any different? Why >> should the ASF support this project instead of one of the others? >> >> I'm concerned that there's only one listed committer. Getting to at >> least 3 committers is going to have to be the first order of business >> for this podling. >> >> -- >> J Aaron Farr jadetower.com [US] +1 724-964-4515 >> 馮傑仁 cubiclemuses.com [HK] +852 8123-7905 >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]