On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 4:42 AM, Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org> wrote:
> There seems to be some concern in Commons that committers are a threat > to the existing codebase. I know the concerns you mention and felt them very much in the discussion about JSch. But, at least for me personally, I don't think that's my concern. Commons is working *now*. Just as Jakarta was working once. But Commons will most likely no longer work when it is growing too much. And the things discussed here (making Commons the target of many new subprojects, which aren't integrated into Commons, thus must likely will never be) are clearly implying this danger. That's not about external committers. It is about too many committers. > I am still of the opinion that it can be handled within Commons, with > IP Clearance registrations at the Incubator. Disagreed. Assuming that the Incubator changes its policy to have projects exiting without community: Why can't another project be the target (depending on the projects topic, of course). Why should this be so special to Commons? Jochen -- I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my telephone; my wish has come true because I can no longer figure out how to use my telephone. -- (Bjarne Stroustrup, http://www.research.att.com/~bs/bs_faq.html#really-say-that My guess: Nokia E50) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org