http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200904.mbox/browser
Summary: (a) Some consider SVN to be part of your distribution, and some don't, so there's no true resolution there (b) Per http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#transition-incubator, this weighs on us less because we're an incubating project that had these dependencies before we joined the ASF. Bottom line: We'll remove those dependencies from SVN altogether in the trunk (and thus for all future releases) by migrating them to Google Code -- just to make sure there's no ambiguity about what's ASF-compliant and what's not. But in the meantime, based on the two points above, this shouldn't hold up the 1.1 release. -T On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Todd Volkert <tvolk...@gmail.com> wrote: >> We don't have any LGPL libraries in the distribution - only in SVN, for some >> demos that aren't actually included in the distribution artifacts. > > Or dependencies of any kind, for that mater. The actual *release* is > compliant with ASF's policies. If our SVN repository is not, that > will be fixed as soon as I get an answer from legal, and I can strip > out the code from the trunk as well as the tag, but all the while, the > tarballs and zip files were compliant. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
