On 31/08/2009, Francis De Brabandere <franci...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is > now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release. > So far the release has been approved by Empire-db committers, but due > to vacation time and other circumstances the Mentors are unable to > review the release. Hence in order to get this release out, we want to > get a bigger audience for vetting our release. We're hoping our > mentors will soon vote, but expect to need more binding votes from the > IPMC to make this release happen. > > Since our previous attempt failed on general@ we prepared a new > release. All issues should be fixed except that we still have one > distribution archive which should not be a problem.
The new release candidate uses exactly the same name for the artifacts and the SVN tag. This makes it very difficult to determine later what was actually voted on. > These are the major change from our previous 2.0.4 release: > - Maven project management > - New database handlers for Apache Derby, H2, PostgreSQL > - New Examples showing WebService integration using Apache CXF > - Unified distribution file for core and struts2 extensions. > > Changelog: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/empire-db/tags/empire-db-parent-2.0.5-incubating/CHANGELOG.txt?revision=807889 > > Maven staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/empire-db-staging-035/ > > Distribution files are located here > http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/ Sigs and hashes seem OK. The NOTICE files in the jar files are not quite right; there is a spurious blank line (not a blocker) at the start (probably a bug in the Maven plugin) and the Project name is incomplete: it should be "Apache Empire-db ..." not "Empire-db ...". > Svn tag: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/empire-db/tags/empire-db-parent-2.0.5-incubating/ Lots of missing SVN properties (not a blocker) See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EMPIREDB-48 The SVN tag contains an "old" directory tree; if this is obsolete, it should be removed from trunk and the next tag. If not, then the source needs to be in the archives. > Rat report for the tag is available here: > http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/rat.txt > (one missing header in a txt file but I suppose this is not a problem) > > Vote open for 72 hours (or longer if needed). > > [ ] +1 > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 > > > -- > http://www.somatik.be > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
