On 08/09/2010 13:44, ant elder wrote: > On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> After much debate both here and on the connectors mailing list, the LCF >> community has voted (see >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-connectors-dev/201008.mbox/browser) >> and would like to officially change our name to be the "Apache Connectors >> Framework". We would like the Incubator PMC to vote to make this official. >> >> [] +1 Change the Lucene Connector Framework to the Apache Connector Framework >> [] 0 Don't care >> [] -1 Don't change it >> >> Since this is a procedural vote >> (http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html), it is a majority rule vote >> with binding votes coming from IPMC members. The vote is open for 72 hours. >> >> Here's my +1 (binding). >> >> Thanks, >> Grant > > -0 > > I agree with the comments from David and others such as [1] and the > suggestion at [2] to call it something more abstract like Apache > Connecto. > > Thats IMHO anyway, I'm not sure that the IPMC should be the ones with > binding votes on this but it would be good if the poddling could take > into consideration our views.
-1 (non-binding) In short, the selection of an abstract name is a considerably better solution, as per the previous discussion on the topic. p
0x62590808.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
