On 14/03/2011, at 10:49 PM, sebb wrote: > On 14 March 2011 06:05, Adelita Padilla <apadi...@g2ix.net> wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> The Apache NPanday community has approved the 1.3-incubating release and we >> are now looking for the approval of the IPMC to publish the release. >> >> These are the major changes included in this release: >> >> * Visual Studio 2010 and .Net 4.0 Framework support >> * Removal of UAC and PAB directories >> >> >> Subversion tag: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/npanday/tags/npanday-1.3-incubating/ > > NOTICE file still says 2011
Fixed in SVN. Not a blocker for the release, I imagine. > > There is no DISCLAIMER anywhere I could find. Fixed in SVN. Liit, I suggest you add that to the release tarballs and re-sign them. It seems like overkill to start the release over for this. > > Nor on the website, for that matter, though there is an Incubator logo. Top right of http://incubator.apache.org/npanday/docs/1.3-incubating/index.html and http://incubator.apache.org/npanday/index.html ? I'm assuming you were looking at the old docs from the last release currently linked from the site (since it was rolled back), which points out it came from Codeplex. > > I think this is a blocker. > >> >> Staging repository: >> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-npanday/ >> >> >> Distribution files are located here: >> http://people.apache.org/~apadilla/npanday/1.3-incubating/ > > The key is registered with public servers, but the name etc. should > ideally have some reference to Apache: > > gpg: searching for "0X7580DCDB" from hkp server pgp.mit.edu > (1) apadilla (adelita) <apadi...@maestrodev.com> > 2048 bit RSA key 7580DCDB, created: 2011-01-14 > > I cannot find the KEYS file. https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/npanday/project/KEYS http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/npanday/KEYS I don't think all users mention Apache, but it'd be good for Liit to add her ASF email address onto the key and resubmit it. > > The repository-builder files seem to contain chunks of a repository, > and contain many non-ASF files. It's not clear if these all have > compatible licences, and anyway they don't seem to be mentioned in the > LICENSE file (or NOTICE, where necessary). > > Potential blocker. > > The MSI file also contains lots of 3rd party jars. I referenced this here: http://markmail.org/message/sjlmw66a76phyn25 It's not ideal, but they are all redistributable in accordance with the legal policy. - Brett -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
