Hi,
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:05 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 15 March 2011 03:27, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > On 14/03/2011, at 10:49 PM, sebb wrote: > > > >> On 14 March 2011 06:05, Adelita Padilla <apadi...@g2ix.net> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> The Apache NPanday community has approved the 1.3-incubating release > and we are now looking for the approval of the IPMC to publish the release. > >>> > >>> These are the major changes included in this release: > >>> > >>> * Visual Studio 2010 and .Net 4.0 Framework support > >>> * Removal of UAC and PAB directories > >>> > >>> > >>> Subversion tag: > >>> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/npanday/tags/npanday-1.3-incubating/ > >> > >> NOTICE file still says 2011 > > > > Fixed in SVN. Not a blocker for the release, I imagine. > > > >> > >> There is no DISCLAIMER anywhere I could find. > > > > Fixed in SVN. Liit, I suggest you add that to the release tarballs and > re-sign them. It seems like overkill to start the release over for this. > I've added the DISCLAIMER.txt to the tarballs and I've uploaded them to http://people.apache.org/~apadilla > > > >> > >> Nor on the website, for that matter, though there is an Incubator logo. > > > > Top right of > http://incubator.apache.org/npanday/docs/1.3-incubating/index.html and > http://incubator.apache.org/npanday/index.html ? > > Yes, the logos are (still) there. > > > I'm assuming you were looking at the old docs from the last release > currently linked from the site (since it was rolled back), which points out > it came from Codeplex. > > I am looking at the current website. > The pages you mention above have the Incubator logo, but no disclaimer > that I could find. > > For an example of how it can be done, see: > http://incubator.apache.org/rat/ > The first paragraph starts: "Apache RAT is an effort undergoing > incubation at The Apache Software Foundation (ASF) ..." > > I've redeployed the website and it now contains the disclaimer, see: http://incubator.apache.org/npanday/ > >> > >> I think this is a blocker. > >> > >>> > >>> Staging repository: > >>> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-npanday/ > >>> > >>> > >>> Distribution files are located here: > >>> http://people.apache.org/~apadilla/npanday/1.3-incubating/ > >> > >> The key is registered with public servers, but the name etc. should > >> ideally have some reference to Apache: > >> > >> gpg: searching for "0X7580DCDB" from hkp server pgp.mit.edu > >> (1) apadilla (adelita) <apadi...@maestrodev.com> > >> 2048 bit RSA key 7580DCDB, created: 2011-01-14 > >> > >> I cannot find the KEYS file. > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/npanday/project/KEYS > > http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/npanday/KEYS > Added apadi...@apache.org to http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/npanday/KEYS > > Thanks, found that later. It would help to include the link in VOTE emails. > > > I don't think all users mention Apache, but it'd be good for Liit to add > her ASF email address onto the key and resubmit it. > > > >> > >> The repository-builder files seem to contain chunks of a repository, > >> and contain many non-ASF files. It's not clear if these all have > >> compatible licences, and anyway they don't seem to be mentioned in the > >> LICENSE file (or NOTICE, where necessary). > >> > >> Potential blocker. > >> > >> The MSI file also contains lots of 3rd party jars. > > > > I referenced this here: http://markmail.org/message/sjlmw66a76phyn25 > > > > It's not ideal, but they are all redistributable in accordance with the > legal policy. > > Do any of them require attribution in the NOTICE file? > > Unless they all use the Apache Licence 2.0, then their licences need > to be added to LICENSE.txt. > In any case, the products should probably be mentioned in LICENSE.txt > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > thanks, -- liit
