Your proposed text does not cover the fact that TDF/LO can lift code from ASF into their products.
(and typo in the first sentence) On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 14:03, <robert_w...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > I'm perceiving that we're circling around on the same points with no new > options coming up. So I'd like to record the state of the issue. If > there is consensus on this formulation, I'll place it in the wiki. Of > course, if the discussion advances the issue or positions move, I can > always go back and revise, > > -Rob > > > =Collabration with LibreOffice= > > LibreOffice uses a dual licesne LGPLv3/MPL. This limits the degree to > which OpenOffice and LibreOffice can collaborate on code. However, we > would be glad to discuss, as a project, ways in which we can collaborate > with them in a way that respects the chosen licenses of both projects. > This could include collaboration on jointly sponsored public events, > interoperability 'plugfests', standards, shared build management > infrastructure, etc. And if TDF decides at a later point to change to a > compatible license, then this would open up additional ways in which we > could collaborate, and we would welcome that as well. We believe that in > practice, the extent to which we may actually collaborate will be > determined by the licence compatibility issue rather than any > unwillingness to collaborate. > > ------------------- > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
