On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Danese, > > > 3) LOTS of people download OOo > > Like maybe 10% of the human population of the planet. And its a big > file. > > Initially we engaged Akamai, but it quickly became too expensive. Serving > up downloads of OOo was pretty intense. I know Apache has all that web > server download traffic and all...but I'm telling you Sun.com quailed at the > throughput, and we shouldn't assume our mileage will vary. There will be > extraordinary infrastructure costs, because it is end-user software (and > there are a LOT of users worldwide). Sun mitigated this problem with > mirrors, but of course that screwed download stats. > > do you have any numbers? > > I am really curious - people are always saying that but I cannot get > out numbers. I believe all you said, I just would like to know how > much it is actually > > Thanks for the interesting read > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > OOo used brainstats, and you can get some numbers. There was 'some' number crunching but that project wasn't updated as usual: http://stats.openoffice.org/ We used bouncer also as a analytics type system here: http://marketing.openoffice.org/marketing_bouncer.html The Mirrobrain-OOo FAQ is also encourage to read. http://marketing.openoffice.org/marketing_bouncer_faq.html -- *Alexandro Colorado* *OpenOffice.org* Español http://es.openoffice.org
