On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:13 AM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Noel J. Bergman <n...@devtech.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> We've repeatedly asked projects to focus on their graduation requirements.
>>> What can we do to help push them in the right direction?
>>
>> Reject the reports, and ask them to resubmit next month.  If the
>> pattern repeats, put them on a monthly schedule.
>
> If a TLP chair sends the board a report that doesn't include enough of
> the right detail what happens is they are sent a quiet and gentle
> reminder, eg [1] (for those with access to private lists). So no
> rejecting the report or requiring a resubmit. Couldn't an equally
> quiet and gentle approach with an email to the poddlings private list
> also be taken here, at least initially?

In the case described by Noel ("repeatedly asked projects"), I think
asking for a report again the next month (or three) is in order.

In the case described by Ant (at least in cases where it appears to be
a one time oversight), a quiet and gentle approach is appropriate.

>   ...ant
>
> [1] 
> https://mail-search.apache.org/members/private-arch/abdera-private/201105.mbox/%3c4dd551ac.9030...@shanecurcuru.org%3E

- Sam Ruby

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to