On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> Jukka Zitting wrote on Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 23:47:38 +0100:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
>> <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Please note that I didn't invent this process. I would have preferred
>> > something much simpler. I just documented the recommendations of the
>> > brand team.
>>
>> Was this a recommendation or a requirement? I.e. are we talking about
>> MUST, SHOULD or MAY?
>>
>
> Thread:
>
>    
> https://mail-search.apache.org/members/private-arch/trademarks/201109.mbox/<4e7f127d.10...@apache.org>
>    Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 12:37:33 +0100
>    To: tradema...@apache.org
>    Subject: Guidance For Podlings [WAS Re: Trademark questions with regards to
>            Apache Flume incubator podling.]
>    Reply-To: tradema...@apache.org
>    Message-ID: <4e7f127d.10...@apache.org>

There are sadly a number of other threads that are relevant too :-(

If people are unhappy with the consequences of policy, please change
it. I'm just trying to document at least one way to satisfy it.

Robert

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to