Well, the Wiki page explicitly says that the chair will assign. On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > No such thing as "leftover". Doubling up (or more) is just fine. > > Q is whether there are some under-reviewed... > On May 8, 2012 6:40 AM, "Benson Margulies" <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I was late to volunteer. Do you have any leftover projects? >> >> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Ross Gardler <rgard...@opendirective.com> >> wrote: >> > I've done my shepherd reviews and made one comment (about Amber) on >> > this list). I'm not sure where you want general observations recording >> > but I have moved the projects to the recommended status category >> > >> > On 7 May 2012 21:03, William A. Rowe Jr. <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: >> >> On 5/4/2012 1:27 PM, Greg Stein wrote: >> >>> In the Board agenda, we have a line where each Director can state they >> have >> >>> reviewed the report (before the meeting). They can also append queries >> and >> >>> comments. Little mini-discussions kinda happen in those comments. >> >>> >> >>> Point here is: provide a similar location for IPMC members (including >> >>> shepherds) to list their review/approval. There is no strict need to >> divvy >> >>> the reviews. Jukka is doing that as a transitionary measure until >> people >> >>> get into it. >> >> >> >> The approach would require just a couple of things; >> >> >> >> * designate a private report-review.txt file svn path which provides >> svn >> >> notification to the incubator-private list. Private, because both >> personal >> >> and confidential questions may be asked and answered in the scope of >> that >> >> approval/question/comment review file. >> >> >> >> * populate that file each month with the list of reports. Those >> reports >> >> themselves could continue to persist in the wiki or could be >> transfered >> >> into that internal edit/discuss report file. >> >> >> >> A comment to that svn review file would be broadcast, so that answers >> and the >> >> followup can either occur as a subsequent commit (asked and answered), >> or can >> >> evolve into an incubator-private mail list dialog (or be referred over >> to the >> >> podling-dev or podling-private list for clarification). >> >> >> >> In all I like the idea. >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Ross Gardler (@rgardler) >> > Programme Leader (Open Development) >> > OpenDirective http://opendirective.com >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
