Hello,

On 8/7/12 4:30 PM, Richard Frovarp wrote:
> On 08/07/2012 06:36 AM, Matthieu Morel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The vote for this S4 release passed with the following results at the
>> vote deadline:
>>
>> +1: 7 (5 binding)
>> -1: 0
>>
>> Details:
>>
>> +1 IPMC:
>> acmurthy, phunt
>>
>> +1 PPMC
>> kishoreg*, leoneu*, fpj
>>
>> +1 wider community
>> Daniel Gomez, Karthik Kambatla
>>
>>
>> Thanks to all the participants to the voting process!
>>
>> I'll now publish the artifacts, and after the sync delay, update the
>> websites and send announcements.
>>
>> Matthieu
>>
>
> Best I know, you need three IPMC votes for it to pass.

Thanks for outlining the missing IPMC vote Flavio, thanks for the clarification Richard, and sorry all for my misinterpretation and for the noise on this list.

It seems that typically mentors vote for releases, and that counts as IPMC votes, unfortunately we now only have 2 mentors for S4 (both +1'ed).

At this point, I believe that we should ask for another IPMC to vote for the release, by sending a specific vote request, even though the vote expired, is this correct? Should we set a timeframe for the vote (I don't see that in previous similar requests)?

Thanks,


Matthieu

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to