That's not your role as chair to be personally concerned about a project release- that's the group's responsibility. You should confine your concerns to our efficacy and ability to carry out the role of an IPMC member properly.
IOW relax, the outcome isn't going to sink the org one way or another ;-). >________________________________ > From: Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> >To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org> >Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 3:55 PM >Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release > >Chris et al, > >I'm suffering from a mild crisis of responsibility here. I'm the VP of >the incubator. cTakes is planning to ship a release containing >something that, according to some lights, is inadmissible. If that >'something' is in *the (source) release*, I have serious qualms. If >it's merely in a the convenience binaries, I have fewer. We have a >ticket open at LEGAL, and no response except postings of opinion. > >So, am I supposed to drop a hammer here, required to drop a hammer >here, or am I having an acute Alexander Haig moment by even >considering dropping a hammer here? > >I know that a number of board members read this list, so perhaps one >or more will tell me which padded cell I should retire to. > >--benson > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > >
