Olemis,
Thanks for interest. I have added Apache Bloodhound to the list of potential integrators in the proposal document (https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ODataProposal). About your question to OData Phyton binding. This is very interesting because of OData as a web protocol is not just bound to a single implementation technology. We don't have concrete plans but an Apache OData community could potentially benefit from a Phyton contribution. Regards, Stephan On 17.06.13 19:33, "Olemis Lang" <ole...@gmail.com> wrote: >On 6/17/13, Klevenz, Stephan <stephan.klev...@sap.com> wrote: >> Dear ASF members, >> >> We would like to propose the OData project to the Incubator. >> >> The OData Proposal is available at: >> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ODataProposal >> >> We welcome your feedback and suggestions. >> > >JFTR , at present there is an ongoing effort to start working on an >integration of the oData standards with Apache Bloodhound (similar to >TracGVizPlugin [1]_ for Google Charts API ; I'll follow up with >further details in a few days if this turns out to be useful / >required ;) . This might also be added to the list of potential >integrations in section «Relationships with Other Apache Products» . > >Therefore I'm curious and would like to know if some effort will be >spent in building official Python bindings for oData . > >FWIW , the way I see it this project will be a very beneficial >addition to the Apache ecosystem > >.. [1] trachacks:TracGvizPlugin > (http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/TracGvizPlugin) > >-- >Regards, > >Olemis. > >Apache Bloodhound contributor >http://issues.apache.org/bloodhound > >Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ >Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ > >Featured article: --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
