On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 01:34:39PM +0100, Ross Gardler wrote: > However, in this specific case the social norm *should* be to allow the > change to proceed - that's the most efficient process.
Modifying a vote that has started is a slippery slope. (The same is true for reusing version numbers: ANY change to something that has been tagged must get a new version number - no matter how small the change may be.) One solution is to restart the vote. Another is to run a parallel vote for the delta/amendment. Concretely, can't you just start a thread on private@ saying "The would-be-PPMC has consensus on inviting X as a committer"? This would allow you to invite X to be a committer shortly after the original vote ends. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
