He said majority, not everybody ant. Try a little harder to understand the written words instead of needing to interject your dissonant 2 cents and things will improve around here.
Anyway the point is that when you see multiple changes to an in-progress VOTE on a proposal, it suggests not that we need to be more flexible, or let the champion dictate common courtesy, but instead that the VOTE should restart once the dust has settled as it was clearly premature. If there's some rush to modify the document instead of following approved policy on adding new committers (which formally doesn't even require a vote), just cancel+restart the vote once the proposal is done being modified. It's the most respectful thing to do. ----- Original Message ----- > From: ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 6:57 PM > Subject: Re: Stratos proposal: is it possible to add another initial > committer? > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Ross Gardler > <rgard...@opendirective.com>wrote: > >> It seems clear that the majority of IPMC members believe this change >> on a vote in progress is not acceptable. >> >> > Don't assume its that clear, i think at least some agree with you that this > is just ISSUE3 and kept quiet, thats what i did. > > I think its fine, its nothing like changing a release artifact during a > release, IMHO the way to judge it is if the champion for the proposal being > voted on doesn't object to the addition, if the champion is ok then just > carry on. > > ...ant > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
