On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > All that I suggest is that candidate Apache projects articulate how they > differ from related projects, and that we consider the strength of this > argument when evaluating the long term viability of the effort and > community. It would be good if proposals have a "related work" section done > with the diligence and detail as the typical academic publication, I > haven't seen that at least recently.
Thanks Andrew for articulating it even more clearly -- this is exactly the extra bit of of info I was suggesting we add to the template. IOW, an explicit informational section may help bring clarity not only for the casual IPCM members, but also to the folks proposing a new project in the first place. Thanks, Roman. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
