On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Sergio Fernández <sergio.fernan...@salzburgresearch.at> wrote: > Hi, > > one of the things I brought from ApacheCon is the idea if providing > dashboard for the podlings. Bitergia presented there their approach [1], and > I think could be useful. See for instance the dashboard they provided for > Apache CloudStack [2]. > > I already discussed it with Roman, and I think we should try to do something > in this direction. I know the experiment with Back Software did not satisfy > everybody, but I think we should keep trying. I can commit some time and > even resources to provide an early proof of concept. >
I am generally against us standing up our own service that does this. We've had a couple of these systems over the years. (pulse.a,o for instance). It takes a non-trivial amount of work to setup and maintain such a system, and invariably it falls apart. Additionally, there are free services that begin monitoring projects either on request or when they are noticed, and I am curious what we really hope to gain by doing it ourselves that a site like open hub doesn't provide. In example: https://www.openhub.net/p/npanday I do agree that things like bitergia provide much deeper sense of analytics, but wonderful if it's really necessary for our purposes. --David --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
