Note - I should say my comment below is in the context of a not-for-profit software foundation using their services. People in different use cases should look at their specific circumstances - obviously :-D
Ross -----Original Message----- From: Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) [mailto:ross.gard...@microsoft.com] Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 12:27 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: dashboarding incubator We already evaluated the Bitergia offering - it is expensive and does not provide sufficient benefit for the money (don't get me started on how metrics are not a good evaluator of open source code...) I fully agree with the comments below. Ross -----Original Message----- From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org] Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 12:24 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: dashboarding incubator On 21 November 2014 20:44, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 3:35 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > > ...I am generally against us standing up our own service that does this. > > We've had a couple of these systems over the years. (pulse.a,o for > > instance). It takes a non-trivial amount of work to setup and > > maintain such a system, and invariably it falls apart.... > > I agree, OTOH if someone wants to help third parties get the data that > they need to implement such services externally that might be fine. > Having our own service will only marginally provide us with something better, and will cost (in endeffect) contractor resources, so I agree with david. rgds jan i. > > -Bertrand > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
