> On Jan 27, 2015, at 6:58 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> > wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com> wrote: >> In short, the pTLP designation is a bit too opaque.... > > So you mean all TLPs should have status labels? > > Might be useful...probatory, active, low activity, attic candidate...why not.
Yeah, these coupled w/ ComDev’s maturity model would help people grok at a glance what’s generally going on w/ the project instead of being forced to go on an easter egg hunt through Jira issues, mailing lists, and commit logs, to try to access the general character of a project. Regards, Alan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
