On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) <ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote: > If I understand the response below correctly you misspoke when you said there > were "export" issues. That in fact there is no related export restriction, > it's actually about the licensing issue. If that's the case then the proposal > is correct in not highlighting these issues - thanks for clarifying that. > > I replied to the third part in response to Bill's question. However, to be > sure my point gets across. Now that you have confirmed there are in fact no > export restrictions then I have no problem with the proposal. However, I'd > still like to be able to evaluate the code and to do so I would need to know > what I'm agreeing to under the evaluation license.
FWIW, the clickthrough license et al worked for me on my Mac with Chrome. Inspecting the code will be a lot easier once the proposal is accepted and we can import the code under ALv2 into our repositories. *grin* -- justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
