On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote:
> > There is no mention of such an item under "known risks" or the > "crypotography" section of the proposal > > so what's this "export" stuff about (assuming the license thing is the > evaluation license)? > > Sorry for not being more explicit: this is just how Pivotal > distribution network works. > And we have to use it in this particular case in order to guarantee > that the evaluation > license has been explicitly acknowledged (as opposed to just being there > in a > tarball). All these constraints has nothing to do with the source code > itself. It is fair to put a bit of text into the risks statement that says that the code is currently encumbered with export limitations due to corporate policy but that these limits will be released as part of the software grant.
