Infra already supports Whimsy so having a TLP is irrelevant in that respect (although on reason Sam is doing this is because infra expressed a concern about maintaining a service that only had Sam working on it).
Ross -----Original Message----- From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 2:32 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Whimsy PMC On Thursday, April 23, 2015, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: > Initial sketch placed on the wiki: > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WhimsyProposal > > Anyone who is so inclined is welcome to edit the proposal directly. > > No urgency or timeframe in mind (other than preferably starting > sometime in 2015ish). My current thinking is to follow in Steve's > footprints and go directly to TLP, but I'm starting a discussion here > (in Incubator) to see if there are any other thoughts on the matter. I like the proposal, it is very clear, I do miss one bit though. If this becomes a TLP project is infra then prepared to support keeping whimsy running 24/7, or do they have additional requirements on the project? maybe the response to the above could be worked into the proposal. rgds jan i > > - Sam Ruby > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
