On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But - and I wanna be very clear that this is a hypothetical - if I were to
> still have significant concerns (either ones that weren't addressed in the
> DISCUSS thread or I missed the DISCUSS thread, etc), it'd still be socially
> permissible (not just procedurally permissible) to -1 a VOTE? I ask 'cos,
> well, I'm easily cowed by social pressure on this sort of thing, so bucking
> the herd isn't easy. If I feel that a potential podling has reached VOTE
> stage while still having issues that in my mind make it a bad candidate to
> enter the Incubator, I want to be sure I can still -1 it without being
> turned into a pariah in the process. =)

Yes, as an example, take a look at the OpenOffice vote[1] that Nick referred to.

Thanks,
--tim

[1] - 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/%3cbanlktinv5a3zpk_9fwhgg8wc3qmafkr...@mail.gmail.com%3E

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to