Thanks - just wanted to make sure. =) A.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > > On Oct 13, 2015, at 10:32 AM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > But - and I wanna be very clear that this is a hypothetical - if I were > to > > still have significant concerns (either ones that weren't addressed in > the > > DISCUSS thread or I missed the DISCUSS thread, etc), it'd still be > socially > > permissible (not just procedurally permissible) to -1 a VOTE? I ask 'cos, > > well, I'm easily cowed by social pressure on this sort of thing, so > bucking > > the herd isn't easy. If I feel that a potential podling has reached VOTE > > stage while still having issues that in my mind make it a bad candidate > to > > enter the Incubator, I want to be sure I can still -1 it without being > > turned into a pariah in the process. =) > > > > (and again - this is purely hypothetical) > > > > Yes, you can vote a -1. > > NO ONE should feel pressured to vote on something in a > way opposite to how they feel. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
