On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: >...
> Huge +1 to the above. Very well said and is exactly how I now start > thing about the problem myself: Incubator is what's needed when > there are gaps in straight to TLP. Lets identify what those gaps > There is one thing the Incubator cannot solve: ASF Members on the direct-to-TLP PMC. That has been the primary metric the Board used for those Resolutions (Zest and Serf). There are a few other direct-to-TLP occurrences which was only about moving code/communities around within the Foundation (STeVe, Whimsy, ORC, etc, lately, and when we blew up umbrellas (eg. Jakarta, XML, Hadoop)). So... I would not look at the Incubator as "get the podling community to look like a candidate for direct-to-TLP", as it really can't do that. The ultimate question, I believe, is: "does the code/community operate according to Foundation principles?" >... Cheers, -g
