On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Joe Brockmeier <j...@zonker.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015, at 08:43 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > I don't think that's the question on the table. Typically, podlings make > > committers == PPMC members. The reasoning being that the only thing a > > PPMC member can do is vote on adding new members. Other votes are all > > non-binding (unless you're an IPMC member). It also helps promote the > > synergy needed to become a TLP, forming a strong PMC. > > I don't suppose we have stats on that, do we? > > My first project was CloudStack, and I was surprised to find other > podlings *didn't* distinguish between committer and PPMC. While PPMC > votes on members, being a committer does give privileges beyond just > being an occasional contributor, so some folks may find it a useful step > between "we have to review all of your patches" and "you're helping with > governance/growth of the project." > > My experience on other projects is the same as Joe. afaik it's up to the podling, and most I've been involved with decided to go with committer != ppmc. Honestly I thought that was the default. Patrick > > jzb > -- > Joe Brockmeier > j...@zonker.net > Twitter: @jzb > http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
