On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Ross Gardler <ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote: > Good point. I should add to my comments that even a CTR project uses RTC for > non-committers. And that a release vote means that at least three people have > reviewed the code from (at least) an IP standpoint, if not from a code > quality standpoint. > > In other words, +1 > > However, RTC projects do not use a mix and that's the point of contention > here, some people feel it is suboptimal (I'm one, but others disagree). The > discussion is not whether CTR also uses RTC at points, I believe that is a > given.
Let me be pedantic for a moment. While RTC projects that use Subversion may disallow work in branches, even by committers; such a restriction isn't even possible in Git -- even for non committers. > Ross - Sam Ruby > -----Original Message----- > From: sa3r...@gmail.com [mailto:sa3r...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Sam Ruby > Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 7:43 AM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...) > > +1 here too. > > Most projects here fall somewhere in a spectrum between "do whatever you want > in a branch" and "don't release without having others approve your work". > Different projects put the point where CTR crosses over to RTC at different > points. > > *shrug* > > - Sam Ruby > > P.S. Personally a fan of CTR, but I'm starting to appreciate our > infrastructure team's puppet workflow where everything (even one line > changes) are done in a branch and everybody asks other person to merge the > changes. > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fcwiki.apache.org%2fconfluence%2fdisplay%2fINFRA%2fGit%2bworkflow%2bfor%2binfrastructure-puppet%2brepo&data=01%7c01%7cRoss.Gardler%40microsoft.com%7c44adea1c26a1499d757f08d2f1c13a31%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=485qCjFlNzNCg1JvNgDxSpSe79EwynxdP9RcmoEOsxw%3d > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >> ++1 >>> On Nov 20, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >>>> ...httpd for example) uses RTC, CTR and Lazy Consensus >>>> simultaneously and works like a dream.... >>> >>> Indeed - those are different tools that each have their own purpose. >>> They just need to be applied in the right places and at the right >>> time. >>> >>> -Bertrand >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
