On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 6:17 AM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > Hi, > >> The presence of the word "incubator" in the URL is deliberate: it alerts >> users >> that a podling is incubating. I'd feel better about this proposal if >> podlings >> weren't so successful about concealing their incubation status[1][2]. >> >> -0, since the Incubator remains unserious about incubation disclaimers on >> websites. > > Perhaps a solution to this it's a require poddlings to be serous about this > when they make a release? i.e. vote -1 if the incubating disclaimer is not > clear on a poddling site. > > (And I would be willing to vote that way on releases if this vote passes)
Well, I hate that solution because it counts on you playing Bad Cop, Justin. Other people need to do their part. We have lots of people voting to remove the controls and only a handful stepping up to address the underlying issues that the controls were meant to address. An even worse example than Eagle: after 6 months in incubation, Impala still has no website at impala.apache.org / impala.incubator.apache.org and the existing site at impala.io encourages people to buy support from a specific vendor! http://impala.io/ Retain Freedom from Lock-in Impala is open source (Apache License), so you can self-support in perpetuity if you wish. However, technical support for those who want it is available via a Cloudera Enterprise subscription. This situation is more dire than I thought. I'm changing my vote to -1 binding. We need more confidence that we can actually count on human oversight to address branding issues before removing the automatic controls. Marvin Humphrey --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
